In recent years, the global emphasis on sustainability has extended into the packaging industry. Traditional plastic films, such as PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate), have long dominated due to their durability and versatility. However, concerns over their environmental impact have driven interest in biodegradable film alternatives like Cellophane and PLA (Polylactic Acid). This article presents a comprehensive comparison between biodegradable films and traditional PET films, focusing on their composition, environmental impact, performance, and costs.
Material Composition and Source
Traditional PET Film
PET is a synthetic plastic resin produced through the polymerization of ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid, both of which are derived from crude oil. As a material that relies entirely on non-renewable fossil fuels, its production is highly energy-intensive and contributes substantially to global carbon emissions.
Biodegradable Film
-
✅Cellophane Film: Cellophane film is a biopolymer film made from regenerated cellulose, primarily sourced from wood pulp. This material is produced using renewable resources such as wood or bamboo, which contribute to its sustainable profile. The manufacturing process involves dissolving cellulose in an alkali solution and carbon disulfide to form a viscose solution. This solution is then extruded through a thin slit and regenerated into a film. While this method is moderately energy-intensive and traditionally involves the use of hazardous chemicals, newer production processes are being developed to reduce the environmental impact and improve the overall sustainability of cellophane production.
-
✅PLA Film: PLA film (Polylactic Acid) is a thermoplastic biopolymer derived from lactic acid, which is obtained from renewable resources such as corn starch or sugarcane. This material is recognized as a sustainable alternative to traditional plastics due to its reliance on agricultural feedstocks rather than fossil fuels. The production of PLA involves the fermentation of plant sugars to produce lactic acid, which is then polymerized to form the biopolymer. This process consumes significantly less fossil fuel compared to the production of petroleum-based plastics, making PLA a more environmentally friendly option.
Environmental Impact
Biodegradability
-
Cellophane: Fully biodegradable and compostable in home or industrial composting conditions, typically degrading within 30–90 days.
-
PLA: Biodegradable under industrial composting conditions (≥58°C and high humidity), typically within 12–24 weeks. Not biodegradable in marine or natural environments.
-
PET: Not biodegradable. Can persist in the environment for 400–500 years, contributing to long-term plastic pollution.
Carbon Footprint
- Cellophane: Life cycle emissions range from 2.5 to 3.5 kg CO₂ per kg of film, depending on production method.
- PLA: Produces approximately 1.3 to 1.8 kg CO₂ per kg of film, significantly lower than traditional plastics.
- PET: Emissions typically range from 2.8 to 4.0 kg CO₂ per kg of film due to fossil fuel use and high energy consumption.
Recycling
- Cellophane: Technically recyclable, but most often composted due to its biodegradability.
- PLA: Recyclable in specialized facilities, though real-world infrastructure is limited. Most PLA ends up in landfills or incineration.
- PET: Widely recyclable and accepted in most municipal programs. However, global recycling rates remain low (~20–30%), with only 26% of PET bottles recycled in the U.S. (2022).
Performance and Properties
-
Flexibility and Strength
Cellophane
Cellophane exhibits good flexibility and moderate tear resistance, making it suitable for packaging applications that require a delicate balance between structural integrity and ease of opening. Its tensile strength generally ranges from 100–150 MPa, depending on the manufacturing process and whether it is coated for improved barrier properties. While not as strong as PET, cellophane’s ability to bend without cracking and its natural feel make it ideal for wrapping lightweight and delicate items like baked goods and candies.
PLA (Polylactic Acid)
PLA provides decent mechanical strength, with a tensile strength typically between 50–70 MPa, which is comparable to that of some conventional plastics. However, its brittleness is a key drawback—under stress or low temperatures, PLA can crack or shatter, making it less suitable for applications requiring high impact resistance. Additives and blending with other polymers can improve PLA’s toughness, but this may affect its compostability.
PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate)
PET is widely regarded for its excellent mechanical properties. It offers high tensile strength—ranging from 50 to 150 MPa, depending on factors like grade, thickness, and processing methods (e.g., biaxial orientation). PET's combination of flexibility, durability, and resistance to puncture and tear makes it the preferred material for beverage bottles, trays, and high-performance packaging. It performs well across a broad temperature range, maintaining integrity under stress and during transport.
-
Barrier Properties
Cellophane
Cellophane has moderate barrier properties against gases and moisture. Its oxygen transmission rate (OTR) typically ranges from 500 to 1200 cm³/m²/day, which is adequate for short-shelf-life products like fresh produce or baked goods. When coated (e.g., with PVDC or nitrocellulose), its barrier performance improves significantly. Despite being more permeable than PET or even PLA, cellophane’s natural breathability can be advantageous for products requiring some moisture exchange.
PLA
PLA films offer better moisture resistance than cellophane but have higher oxygen permeability than PET. Its OTR generally falls between 100–200 cm³/m²/day, depending on film thickness and crystallinity. While not ideal for oxygen-sensitive applications (like carbonated beverages), PLA performs well for packaging fresh fruits, vegetables, and dry foods. Newer barrier-enhanced PLA formulations are being developed to improve performance in more demanding applications.
PET
PET delivers superior barrier properties across the board. With an OTR as low as 1–15 cm³/m²/day, it is particularly effective at blocking oxygen and moisture, making it ideal for food and beverage packaging where long shelf life is essential. PET’s barrier capabilities also help maintain product flavor, carbonation, and freshness, which is why it dominates the bottled beverage sector.
-
Transparency
All three materials—Cellophane, PLA, and PET—offer excellent optical clarity, making them suitable for packaging products where visual presentation is important.
-
Cellophane has a glossy appearance and a natural feel, often enhancing the perception of artisan or eco-friendly products.
-
PLA is highly transparent and provides a smooth, glossy finish, similar to PET, which appeals to brands that value clean visual presentation and sustainability.
-
PET remains the industry benchmark for clarity, especially in applications like water bottles and clear food containers, where high transparency is essential to showcase product quality.
Practical Applications
-
Food Packaging
Cellophane: Commonly used for fresh produce, bakery items for gifts, like cellophane gift bags, and confectionery due to breathability and biodegradability.
PLA: Increasingly used in clamshell containers, produce films, and dairy packaging due to its clarity and compostability, like PLA cling film.
PET: The industry standard for beverage bottles, frozen food trays, and various containers, prized for its strength and barrier function.
-
Industrial Use
Cellophane: Found in specialty applications like cigarette wrapping, pharmaceutical blister packaging, and gift wrap.
PLA: Used in medical packaging, agricultural films, and increasingly in 3D printing filaments.
PET: Extensive use in consumer goods packaging, automotive parts, and electronics due to its strength and chemical resistance.
Choosing between biodegradable options like Cellophane and PLA or traditional PET films depends on multiple factors including environmental priorities, performance needs, and budget constraints. While PET remains dominant due to low cost and excellent properties, the environmental burden and consumer sentiment are driving a shift toward biodegradable films. Cellophane and PLA offer significant ecological advantages and can enhance brand image, especially in eco-conscious markets. For companies looking to stay ahead of sustainability trends, investing in these alternatives can be both a responsible and strategic move.
Related Products
Post time: Jun-03-2025